 |
Issue 34
November/December 2000
Infinite Energy Magazine
Book Review
Biological Transmutations
by C. Louis Kervran
ISBN 0-916508-47-1, $18.50 Paperback, 163 pp.
Happiness Press, 1980 (Reprinted 1998)
Review by Eugene Mallove
From Infinite Energy #34,
November/December 2000
Reading this translation and compilation of a number of
Prof. Louis Kervran’s pre-1970 works is very
disturbing, producing the disorientation that accompanies a possible deep
paradigm shift in science. Kervran (1901-1983), a
medical scientist and engineer with a high official position in the French
research and occupational health community, had a life-long interest in the
possibility of biological transmutations. His curiosity apparently began in his
youth when he watched the hens pecking at specks of mica in the farmyard. His
later professional observations concerned (in one small part) the anomalous
re-appearance of robust calcium-bearing eggshells in calcium-deprived chickens
that had been administered dietary mica (a potassium-rich mineral). Over a
century earlier (in 1799), French chemist Louis Nicolas Vauquelin had noted this. The Kervran bio-transmutation story
and its background is summarized eloquently in “Alchemists in the Garden,” a
chapter of the best-selling book The
Secret Life of Plants by Peter Tompkins and the late Christopher Bird.
If Kervran’s thesis is true, how
could mainstream researchers, through the era of sophisticated modern
biochemistry and molecular biology, have missed the omnipresence of biological
nuclear transmutation? The critics’
answer is simple: biological transmutation is delusion or fabrication—just as
cold fusion remains, from their perspective. Post-1989 cold fusion critics, in fact, used the Kervran story to mock Fleischmann and Pons by linking them with a man they said
believed in “nuclear powered chickens.” But for those who seriously examine the
evidence for inorganic, low-energy nuclear reactions and heavy element
transmutation on electrodes in cold fusion experiments, there is sufficient
reason to take Kervran’s hypothesis seriously. If non-biological low-energy nuclear reactions (LENR) exist in the
laboratory, why not in the natural world?
Indeed, with the backdrop of the cold fusion/LENR experience
of the past eleven years, Kervran’s work acquires far
more significance. It may well turn out that cold fusion studies, pregnant as they are with
revolutionary science and technology, may be but a late-blossoming appendage to
a much greater truth about what Mother Nature herself has developed. This
possibility may offend some cold fusion investigators, who perhaps fancy that
they “got there first.” We know how uncomfortable some cold fusion researchers
are with the copious evidence for heavy element transmutation in modern
experiments. Eventually it may be recognized that pioneers, such as Prof. Kervran, were on the low-energy nuclear reaction pathway
long before the
Utah
announcement.
Kervran’s thesis is that the
transmutation of elements, in particular by reactions among the first few dozen
of the periodic table, occurs regularly in biological systems—both in microbes
and in multicellular organisms such as human beings.
Transmutation is inherent to biology. He concluded that hydrogen
and oxygen nuclei primarily, by adding or subtracting from other nuclei, is the essence of transmutation in biology. Some examples: 11Na + 8O --> 19K; 19K + 1H --> 20Ca; 20Ca
- 1H --> 19K;
or 12Mg + 8O --> 20Ca. Carbon might also participate, e.g. 14Si + 6C --> 20Ca. Kervran did not suggest how such
exothermic and endothermic bio-nuclear reactions might be facilitated at the
nuclear-atomic level (others would do that later1), but he did
collect and correlate many anomalous biochemical observations from nineteenth
and twentieth century researchers. He claimed these supported his conclusions,
but he also made original observations and conducted his own experiments. If Kervran’s thesis is correct, the natural world may teem
with countless bio-alchemical factories, which, in turn, work profound
alterations in the mineralogical composition of the planet. Geophysics Prof. M. Camberfort wrote to Kervran in 1974, “I have spoken of your work in my most recent book, because I consider
that your hypotheses, largely confirmed in certain cases, are the only ones
susceptible of explaining a number of facts noted by geologists, so far
explained (in geological circles) by fairy tales and old wives’ tales.”
Astronomer Carl Sagan, on the other hand, wrote to Kervran in 1962: “The types of reactions which you are
proposing are quite impossible in ordinary chemistry. . .I would strongly suggest that you read an elementary textbook in nuclear
physics.” Sagan died in 1996, never having come to
terms with cold fusion or Kervran.
In papers and books from 1959 through 1983, Kervran synthesized his biotransmutation ideas. Notable among his books, all published by Librarie Maloine in
France
,
are: Biological Transmutations (1962), Proofs in Geology and Physics of
Weak Energy Transmutations (1973), Proofs
in Biology of Weak Energy Transmutation (1975), and Biological Transmutations and Modern Physics (1983). For the
softbound English edition under review, translator Michel Abehsera compiled and adapted an apparently small but representative portion of Kervran’s work prior to 1970. In his Foreword, Abehsera describes a meeting with Kervran:
“. . .he showed himself such a dragon in science that nothing but science was
discussed. . .he knew his subject well; he seemed to have read all the
scientific books and articles published all over the world, to know the work of
every living scientist. And when I told him that he had given to science a new
direction and hope, he answered, his face growing red, ‘I simply pointed out
what has always existed.’”
During his lifetime Kervran received support for his work from several mainstream scientists who conducted biotransmutation experiments. Prominent among these was
Prof. Pierre Baranger, chief of the Laboratory for
Organic Chemistry at the École Polytechnique in Paris. Prof. Baranger in the late 1950s repeated the seed growth experiments of von Herzeele (conducted and published from 1876 to 1883), in
which elements appeared to be produced in seeds sprouted in distilled water alone (based on analysis of the ashed seeds and plants). Von Herzeele had found that phosphorus went to sulfur, calcium to phosphorus, magnesium into
calcium, etc.—many of the findings that Kervran would
later ratify. Baranger reported his work in January 1958 at a prestigious scientific institute in
Switzerland. In an interview with the magazine Science et Vie in 1959,2 he said:
My results look impossible, but there
they are. I have taken every precaution. I have repeated the experiments many
times. I have made thousands of analyses for years. I have had the results
verified by third parties who did not know what I was about. I have used
several different methods. I changed my experimenters. But there is no way out;
we have to submit to the evidence: plants know the old secret of the
alchemists. Every day under our very gaze they are transmuting elements. . .I
have been teaching chemistry at the École Polytechnique for twenty years, and believe me, the
laboratory which I direct is no den of false science. But I have never confused
respect for science with the taboos imposed by intellectual conformism. For me,
any meticulously performed experiment is a homage to science even if it shocks
our ingrained habits. Von Herzeele’s experiments were
too few to be absolutely convincing. But their results inspired me to control
them with all the precaution possible in a modern lab and to repeat them enough
times so that they would be statistically irrefutable. That’s what I’ve done.
No matter how solid the experimental evidence, biological
transmutation, like cold fusion and inorganic low-energy transmutation, flies
in the face of a paradigm that began at the very foundation of chemistry in the
late eighteenth century: elements retain their identities—they do not change
into other elements. Antoine Laurent Lavoisier (1743-1794), widely considered to be the “father of chemistry” or even the
“Newton of chemistry,” according to Isaac Asimov,3 is responsible
for that paradigm. We may regard this as a brilliant insight that was perhaps
necessary to help make sense of the bewildering facts that emerged from
centuries of alchemical experimentation. Moreover, the paradigm is ordinarily
true, but the problem with the dogma launched by Lavoisier (ironically at the very time his contemporary Vauquelin was questioning the origin of calcium in chicken egg shells!) is that it has
been too powerful, too rigid, and too enduring.
Lavoisier’s scientific career
ended on May 8, 1794, when he was guillotined during the French Revolution for
having ties to “tax farmers.”3 His paradigm of element immutability
survived the discovery of radioactivity in 1896 and the host of other
conventionally accepted nuclear reactions. Unfortunately, it has grown so
strong over two centuries that resistance to cold fusion, low-energy nuclear
reactions, and especially biological transmutation remains intense. However,
prior to the explosion of biochemical knowledge in the mid to late twentieth
century at least one significant voice was raised in support of greater
circumspection. Louis de Broglie, one of the
luminaries of modern quantum mechanics is quoted by Kervran:
“It is premature to reduce the vital process to the quite insufficiently
developed conceptions of nineteenth and even twentieth century physics and
chemistry.”
Perhaps it is time to return to the wisdom of de Broglie. Kervran’s work may have
been a beginning in that direction. This book, though limited in scope and in
places lacking the detail that is surely available in Kervran’s original material, is a very useful introduction and overview of Kervran’s ideas and the field of biological transmutation.
This area seems destined to grow, especially with the recent founding of a
formal society for the study of bio-transmutation, according to the
announcement by French cold fusion researcher Dr. Jean-Paul Biberian.4 Experimenters from France to Japan are now hard at work on this exciting new
frontier. Others have already published contemporary scientific works.5,6,7 We occasionally even hear rumors that certain biotechnology companies may be
working in this area!
Though this book includes a six-page bibliography, and
footnotes do provide many additional references to the scientific literature,
it is disappointing that not all scientific studies referred to by name are
adequately referenced. That is a small price to pay for the vista that this
book opens on a possible new reality that may have been within us and around us
for so long. The potential implications for science, technology, agriculture,
and medicine are so large, the work of Kervran and of
those who came before him demands great attention and the most thorough
investigation.
References
1. Goldfein, S. 1978. “Energy
Development from Transmutations in Biological Systems,” May, U.S. Army report;
reprinted in Infinite Energy, 3, 18,
78-82.
2. Tompkins, P. and Bird, C. 1973. The Secret Life of Plants, Harper & Row Publishers, New York;
Chapter 17, “Alchemists in the Garden.”
3. Asimov, I. 1982. Asimov’s
Biographical Encyclopedia of Science and Technology, Second Revised
edition, Doubleday & Company, Garden City.
4. Rothwell, J. and Mallove, E.
“Summary Report on ICCF8: Eighth International Conference on Cold Fusion,” Infinite Energy, 6, 33, 25-32.
5. Komaki, H. 1993. “Observations on the Biological Cold
Fusion or the Biological Transmutation of Elements,” Frontiers of Cold Fusion (Proceedings of the Third International
Conference on Cold Fusion, Nagoya, October 1992), ed. H. Ikegami, Universal
Academy Press, p. 555.
6. Vysotskii, V.I., Kornilova, A.A., and Samyolenko,
I.I. 1996. “Experimental Discovery and Investigation of the Phenomenon of
Nuclear Transmutation of Isotopes in Growing Biological Cultures,” Infinite Energy, 2, 10, 63-66.
7. Vysotskii, V.I. and Kornienko, Y.A. 2000. “Gamma Decay Control and Cold Nuclear
Fusion Are the Two Yields of the Controlled Rheological Process Application,” Infinite Energy,
6, 31, 64-65.
|