|
Breaking Through Editorial: Aliens
from the Basement
(Originally Published January-February,
2000 In Infinite Energy Magazine Issue #29)
by Eugene Mallove, Sc.D.
It is coincidental that this essay touches
on aliens where they are and what energies they might command.
Coincidental, because in this issue (p. 29) you will find optical
physicist Dr. Bruce Maccabee's article, "Prosaic Explanations: The
Failure of UFO Skepticism." Infinite Energy does not, of
course, intend to become a magazine of UFO investigation, as I note
in introducing Maccabee's article. We are very interested, however,
in promoting open-minded discussion of evidence for major claimed
anomalies in science beyond radical new energy sources. We are particularly
concerned whenever the methodology of evidence handling is abused
and masqueraded as careful investigation, as is often done by some
skeptics.
For better or worse, "aliens" have entered the evolving
paradigm of how science is conducted. They will affect us all. Looking
back on my own career in engineering, science, and journalism, I
realize that a good part of it has emerged from an interest in the
possibility of extraterrestrial life aliens. In my teenage
amateur astronomy days I wondered passionately about which planets
in our Solar System might be inhabited by intelligent life
or by anything we'd recognize as life, let alone the intelligent
variety. This was at the early post-Sputnik beginning of the Space
Age.
While doing coursework at MIT toward my two degrees
in aeronautical/astronautical engineering, I became most interested
in very advanced propulsion systems ones that could open the
Solar System for humankind, beyond the pathetic chemical rockets
of then and today.
With sufficiently advanced propulsion, such as ion
engines or fission-energized rockets that heat hydrogen propellant,
we could at least visit more easily those places nearby where life
might be found. Another link of past with present: The molten-core
(liquid droplet core) fission nuclear rocket was the subject of
my Master's thesis. Now defunct, the fission rocket era of the 1960s
might be reborn when low-energy nuclear reactions (LENR) can perform
as reliably as or better than conventional fission sans the
need for massive neutron shielding.
To be frank, my interest in rocketry and aliens came
from the basement. As did many others, I had a teenage romance with
dangerous pyrotechnic ignitions an outgrowth of early 1960s
basement experiments with bombs and rockets. (This was before the
era of packaged model rockets, which are now commonly available.)
"Basement bombing" was a typical rite of passage for apolitical,
pre-terrorist-era male youth. (In 2000 such activities might land
a teenage boy in jail. In 1960, the fire marshall merely told me
and my friends not to do such things any more, at least not with
0.75-inch diameter copper pipes stuffed with gunpowder!) Today officialdom
is sand-bagging us again. The DOE fire marshals and an academic
priesthood warns us away from much more significant experiments:
"Stop! Don't do cold fusion." Alas, the more things change, the
more they stay the same.
Patience, aliens are coming. Paralleling rocketry,
I grew interested in the search for extraterrestrial civilizations
via radio-telescopes (then called CETI, now SETI). This had just
begun with Frank Drake's brief microwave observation of Epsilon
Eridani and Tau-Ceti back in 1960 Project Ozma. That search
was in the "water-hole" near the 1420 MHz hydrogen emission
line. My fascination was intense and early. Long before Carl Sagan
became a household name, as a fifteen-year-old I attended and taped
one of his earliest lectures on extraterrestrial life on a
portable (reel-to-reel!) tape recorder at a local junior college
in New London, Connecticut. Carl was a great salesman for aliens
even then. He certainly helped sell me, a mathematics teacher's
and plumber's son not a scientist. I did not go into plumbing,
but the water focus of my father and grandfather may have recapitulated
itself when I entered the cold fusion water-as-fuel
controversy.
As the noisy sixties wore on, it became clear that
the Solar System, interesting as it seemed, was not enough. We just
had to plan for interstellar travel if we were ever to encounter
really interesting planets with intelligent beings. Especially hard
to find would be "dumb ones" (Carl's words) like us, who might not
have an interest in microwave signaling. There would be smart ones
too. Some of the early books on SETI spoke of a Kardashev Type-II
civilization, which might have gotten control of the entire energy
output of its star by wrapping it in a durable cocoon. That would
be quite a feat, but still just solar power writ large. We might
see these societies, or so it was suggested by Freeman Dyson, by
observing their infrared emissions. A Kardashev Type-III civilization
might command the energy output of an entire galaxy.
This was all postulated with a straight face, with
hardly a thought about where the stupendous energies of Kardashev
Type-III would come from. If it wasn't solar power, what could it
be? That was left unanswered. It is amazing what stuff can be discussed
in polite academic circles, providing it doesn't actually do
anything or have any direct relevance to contemporary technologies.
But bring in a civilization-changing jar of heavy water that creates
excess heat, and all hell breaks loose.
Maybe the aliens were deep into hot fusion, or perhaps
antimatter annihilation? Later came speculation about black holes
and titanic energies that might be derived therefrom. Thermonuclear
fusion, the nemesis of today, seemed to me then more reachable.
One of my propulsion courses at MIT incubated a paper that showed
that Robert Bussard's interstellar ramjet concept seemed to be on
the right track. He had the idea of scooping up interstellar hydrogen
that could be used ramjet-style in a fusion propulsion system. The
rocketry problem would be solved by scooping up tenuous interstellar
fuel along the way much easier said than done. In 1989, as
the cold fusion age dawned, Dr. Gregory Matloff and I compiled summaries
of what was then known about interstellar flight The Starflight
Handbook: A Pioneer's Guide to Interstellar Travel, John Wiley
& Sons.
Then there are the UFOs. Even the great Sagan had
had a fling with them, as did I in the early 1970s; I even investigated
a few cases as an avocation. Who wouldn't be curious about all these
strange reports of aliens actually here, which surfaced from time-to-time.
Sagan grew inclined to dismiss all UFO reports, although he did
argue that past visitations might well have happened that
we should be vigilant for any archeological signs of visits in the
safe, distant past. That seemed and still seems a paradox to me:
believing that "others" well might have been here 200,000 years
ago and left calling cards, but are unlikely to be here now. Hmmm.
It all boils down to what the physics known to the
aliens might allow them to do. If you believe that physics is largely
a closed book resting on secure pillars, you might well be inclined
to dismiss as bunk the reported visits and gymnastics of alleged
alien craft. But certain "safe" articles have begun to appear in
even the mainstream literature that suggest that star travel by
very unconventional means might not be all that difficult for ETI
and for us eventually. When we're collectively smart enough
not to deny even carefully measured, well-reproduced excess energy
and nuclear products from electrochemical experiments, then maybe
we'll have passed the intelligence test for starflight done with
new physics. Not until then.
Scientific American, January 2000 features
the article, "Negative Energy, Wormholes and Warp Drive." The ordinarily
conservative, cold fusion-denying Scientific American editors
appear quite enthusiastic about this scheme of Lawrence H. Ford
and Thomas A. Roman. This is how they promote the article: "Contrary
to a popular misconception, Albert Einstein's theories do not strictly
forbid either faster-than-light travel or time travel. In principle,
by harnessing the elusive force of negative energy, one can shorten
stellar distances by bending space time around would-be star trekkers."
Editor John Rennie calls this a "legitimate scientific
perspective." Why "legitimate"? Why, of course, because the authors
are using the "laws of physics," meaning the "laws" that Rennie
believes are the law. The article is "safe" for Rennie, because
he knows that we are unlikely to get ourselves a bunch of "negative
energy" to create the star drive. Again, mainstream scientists'
speculations based on accepted "laws" is fine for those of Mr. Rennie's
mold. Just let there be any claim that someone on Earth or
smart aliens elsewhere might have solved the problems of star
travel or infinite energy in a more straightforward way, and the
claimants are dispatched to the appropriate Gulag of the present
Inquisition.
Sir Arthur C. Clarke recently broke the Nature
barrier via a message to Earth couched in science fiction and humor.
Read his stellar essay in Nature, Vol. 402, November 4, 1999,
p. 19, "Improving the Neighbourhood." The essay drew a bit of critical
mail, perhaps because Clarke generously and courageously dedicated
it at the end to "Drs. Pons and Fleischmann, Nobel laureates of
the twenty-first century."
Written from the perspective of a nearby alien civilization,
the essay recounts the aliens' observation that Earth civilization
destroyed itself in what may have been an "industrial accident."
Clarke writes slyly, "After several false starts, involving low-temperature
nuclear reactions of scientific interest but no practical value,
they succeeded in tapping the quantum fluctuations that occur at
the very foundations of space-time. This gave them access to a virtually
infinite source of energy." The aliens' perspective on we terrestrial
bumblers? Clarke: ". . .by mishandling the ultimate forces of the
universe, they triggered a cataclysm which detonated their own planet
and, very shortly afterwards, its single large moon."
Clarke's message may not be just an entertaining story.
We should be prepared to find these "industrial accidents." One
can see already that the cosmos is a very violent place. What part
of that violence might be attributable to life forms remains to
be learned. An attraction to aliens that for me began in the basement
has brought me full circle. I have come to believe that if infinite
energy based on new physics is really there for the taking, as I
firmly believe it is, of course the aliens have it! And of
course they could/would use it to come here. This says nothing
about whether they are already here and what they are doing
entirely different questions. The people in SETI and the UFO communities
should think about that.
|